|by D. L. Adams
The Constitution of the United States is the foundation of resistance to Sharia law and Islamization. According to Article 6 of the Constitution, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and no other law can supersede it. It is important that we understand Sharia law and the Islamic doctrine from which Sharia is derived.
Our leaders and the majority of our people know nothing of Islamic doctrine and nothing of Sharia. They must be educated, quickly.
We must learn the doctrine of Islam and we must hold our judiciary and our local, state, and national leaders to their oaths to uphold and defend the Constitution. Sharia law is fundamentally antithetical to our Constitution and cannot be allowed an iota of legitimacy or authority in our democratic society.
There should no longer be any doubt in the minds of Americans whatever that Sharia law and the Constitution of the United States are mutually exclusive. Sharia is counter to all of our concepts of freedom, inclusiveness, justice, decency, equality, and the rule of law. For those who still have some question on the matter there is this situation for your review.
AL-LAITH: A 10-year-old bride was returned last Sunday to her 80-year-old husband by her father who discovered her at the home of her aunt with whom she has been hiding for around 10 days.
A local newspaper said the husband, who denies he is 80 in spite of claims by the girl’s family, accused the aunt of meddling in his affairs. “My marriage is not against Shariah. It included the elements of acceptance and response by the father of the bride,” he said.
He added that he had been engaged to his wife’s elder sister and that this broke off as she wanted to continue with her education. “In light of this, her father offered his younger daughter. I was allowed to have a look at her according to Shariah and found her acceptable,” he said.
Source: Arab News, August 26, 2009 This story was also posted on Daniel Pipes’ site.
Sharia law is the codification of the commands of Allah and Mohammed and the Sunna of Mohammed (found in Sira and Hadith). Since Mohammed had a child bride, it is therefore “sunna” for all Muslims that is, acceptable. As the 80-year old husband in the story above states quite accurately, his marriage to a ten year old is both sunna and within his rights under Sharia law.
Anything that Mohammed did or said or commanded is considered “correct”, that is “allowed” within Islam. Mohammed is the perfect example of humanity for all Muslims to follow forever. Mohammed married Aisha when she was 6, and “consummated” the “marriage” when she was 9. The 80-year old “husband” is following the perfect example of Mohammed so he is in the right according to Islamic doctrine. (Hadith, Sahih Muslim; 113,031, 5977)
Child abuse is not supported by the Constitution of the United States, quite the contrary.
The critical difference between Jewish and Christian law and Sharia (Islamic law) is that Jewish and Christian law are subordinate to the secular laws of the cultures in which Jews and Christians reside. This is not the case with Sharia.
Sharia is both absolutist and universal – everyone, including non-Muslims must submit to Sharia law. Causing the unbeliever to submit to Sharia is one of the core purposes of Islam itself.
Mohammed: “I have been ordered to wage war against mankind until they accept that there is no god but Allah and that they believe I am His prophet and accept all revelations spoken through me. When they do these things I will protect their lives and property unless otherwise justified by Islamic law, in which case their fate lies in Allah’s hands.” (Hadith, Muslim; 001,0031)
47:3 This is because the unbelievers follow lies while the believers follow the truth sent down from their Lord. It is in this manner that Allah sets forth the rules of conduct for mankind. (Koran)
47:4 When you encounter the unbelievers on the battlefield, cut off their heads until you have thoroughly defeated them and then take the prisoners and tie them up firmly. Afterward, either allow them to go free or let them pay you their ransom until the war is over. This you are commanded. If it had been Allah’s will he would have taken out His vengeance upon them, but He has commanded this so that He may test you by using these others. As for those who are killed for Allah’s cause [jihad], He will not let their sacrifice be in vain. He will lead them into Paradise, of which He has told them. (Koran)
The doctrine of Islam is very clear on points regarding the unbeliever, or “kafir”. Sharia is the tool by which all peoples, believers and non-believers, are made to submit to Islam.
As Sharia law is contrary in every one of its components to our Constitution, and is essentially a foreign legal system whose purpose is to supplant the Constitution itself; it must therefore be opposed. This opposition is founded upon human rights grounds and upon the oaths that all public servants across our country take to defend and uphold the Constitution.
Article 6 of the Constitution is clear on these points. The Founders were prescient in many ways. They knew that foreign forces, or oppositional anti-human concepts could take root in the United States. They planned for this eventuality with Article 6 (among others).
All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
The oaths of office of government servants, state level government officials, the military, and members of the Congress, officers of the courts, as well as the President reflect this requirement to uphold and defend the Constitution.
Senator’s Oath of Office:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same…”
Lawyer’s Oath – State Bar of Michigan:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm):
I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Michigan…”
Lawyer’s Oath – State Bar of Louisiana:
“I solemnly swear (or affirm) I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Louisiana…”
Congressional Oath of Office:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God. “
Supreme Court Oath of Office:
According to Title 28, Chapter I, Part 453 of the United States Code, each Supreme Court Justice takes the following oath:
“I, [NAME], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
US President Oath of Office:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
New Hampshire Oath for Civil Officers (including state officials):
“I, A.B. do solemnly swear, that I will bear faith and true allegiance to the United States of America and the state of New Hampshire, and will support the constitution thereof. So help me God.”
US Military Enlistment Oath:
I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…
It is clear that all United States public servants, as well as our military personnel are obligated by voluntary oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. Article 6 of the Constitution clearly states that no other law other than the Constitution itself shall be the law of the land.
As Sharia law fundamentally is meant to usurp the law of the land (Constitution) and replace it with itself, it must therefore be opposed by all officials of the United States. Every citizen of the United States should remind their officials that they are obligated by their solemn oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.
Islam’s opposition to our Constitution and our country could not be clearer. Allah and Mohammed hate the kafir (non-Muslims) and command that Islam be at war with them forever, until there are no more kafirs.
[2.217] They ask you concerning the sacred month about fighting in it. Say: Fighting in it is a grave matter, and hindering (men) from Allah’s way and denying Him, and (hindering men from) the Sacred Mosque and turning its people out of it, are still graver with Allah, and persecution is graver than slaughter*; and they will not cease fighting with you until they turn you back from your religion, if they can; and whoever of you turns back from his religion, then he dies while an unbeliever– these it is whose works shall go for nothing in this world and the hereafter, and they are the inmates of the fire; therein they shall abide.
DLA: *”Idolatry is a greater sin than murder” is the translation according to some scholars.
[8:39] And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah; but if they desist, then surely Allah sees what they do.
According to the Sira of Mohammed (the biography of Mohammed), submission of the kafirs to Islam is all that matters (Ishaq, 484).
[3:151] “We will strike terror into the hearts of the kafirs because they worship others besides Allah, which he gave them no permission to do. Their home will be the fire, a terrible resting place for the evil doers.”
[9.5] So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters (kafirs) wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate (jizya tax), leave their way free to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
The doctrine of Islam is clear. Its purpose is to supplant the religions, government, and culture of the host culture and replace them with Islam and Sharia law.
“Mohammed said, ‘I have been directed to fight the kafirs until every one of them admits, ‘There is only one god and that is Allah.’ Whoever says, “There is only one god and that is Allah,’his body and possessions will be protected by me except for violations of Islamic law, in which case his fate is with Allah, to be punished or forgiven as he sees fit.” (Hadith Bukhari; 4, 52, 196)
The importance of immigration to kafir lands (countries that are non-Muslim) is doctrinally codified in Islam. In fact, the first year of the Islamic calendar is notthe year in which Mohammed began his prophethood but rather the year in which he emigrated from Mecca to Medina.
Immigration is fundamentally important to the growth of Islam; we are seeing it across Europe as Islamic immigration is causing upheavals and strife in too many European countries to mention. These upheavals occur not because of any hostility on the part of the host peoples, much the contrary – the people of Europe have welcomed Muslim immigrants. The problems of Europe are foundationally built upon the lack of interest of the “Muslim community” to assimilate.
“Muslim hate fanatics plan to take over Britain by having more babies and forcing a population explosion, it has been revealed.
The swollen Muslim population would be enough to conquer Britain from inside, they claim.
Fanatics told a meeting of young Muslims on the anniversary of the 9/11 atrocity, that it would then be easy to impose Sharia law on the population, the Sun newspaper reported.”
(September 13, 2009; London Evening Standard)
The disintegration of Europe is founded upon the desire of Islamic immigrants to change the host countries and cultures in which they now live. This is sunna as Mohammed did this in Medina when he immigrated there from Mecca. (Please see the excellent book on Islamic immigration Modern Day Trojan Horse: Al-Hijra, The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration, Accepting Freedom or Imposing Islam?)
The oppositional nature of Islam to kafir (non-Muslim) countries and cultures is firmly written in the doctrine. We ignore the doctrine at our existential peril.
“[9.29] Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.” (Koran)
It is difficult for many post-modernists (and multiculturalists) who believe in nothing (because for them everything is equivalent) to conceive that people can be motivated so strongly by an ideology.
It is clear that we are in no way living in a “post-historical” world but rather in a world in which we are assaulted daily by historical forces that we do not understand because they are not taught in our schools and universities. This is a systemic failure in our American culture that must quickly be rectified if we want to continue to have an American culture and system of government.
The word “Islam” means “submission”. An adherent of this ideology is “one who submits”. Adherents submit to the commands of Allah and Mohammed and the “perfect example” of the life and actions of Mohammed as found in Sira and Hadith. Koran is considered the perfect word of god and cannot be questioned. The doctrine of Islam cannot be criticized or analyzed, it can only be implemented. The implementation of the doctrine of Islam means soft or violent jihad against the kafirs, everywhere and forever until there are no more kafirs.
It is our responsibility as lovers of freedom and democracy to oppose the growth of Islam and the implementation of Sharia law in our country. It is the responsibility of our public servants and our military to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. We must remind our local, state and Federal leaders of their responsibility and of their oath.
Our Constitution is the key to opposing Sharia law in the United States. The Constitution is a special document unprecedented in the history of humanity. It is our responsibility to uphold and protect it. Our forebears have done this; now we must do it, too. This is our duty as Americans and decent people across the world.
When faced with existential threats as Islam is to our way of life, we must respond. We must learn the doctrine of Islam, and educate one another about it. We must educate our leaders and remind them of their duty to protect and defend the country and Constitution. Nothing less is acceptable.
Enter email address…