Shuster Gloats: Finger-Bitten ObamaCare Protester Treated By Medicare

Check out the Tweet that MSNBC’s David Shuster posted a little while ago. He apparently sees some significant irony in the fact that the ObamaCare protester who had a finger bitten off by a supporter of Pres. Obama’s plan was treated by Medicare.

“that’s right, it was medicare… a govt run program that represents all the protestor objects to… it was medicare that treated him.”

To which we would respond: so what?

The victim was 65 years old. Under the current system, he’s covered by Medicare. Already short a finger, should he cut off his nose to spite his face? For Shuster, the fact that Medicare was involved is some kind of proof that government programs are the way to go. Where’s the logic? The question is what is best for the country going forward.

View article…

ObamaCare Supporter Bites Finger Off Elderly Man

You have a healthcare rally with opposing sides. Someone from one side bites the finger off an elderly man from the other side. You and I both know which side did the biting, but can the media just come out and say “Moonbat Bites Man”? Of course not. See if you can even follow the multi-paragraph description of the event.

A witness from the scene says a man was walking through the anti-reform group to get to the pro-reform side when he got into an altercation with the 65-year-old, who opposes health care reform.

The 65-year-old was apparently aggressive and hit the other man, who then retaliated by biting off his attacker’s pinky, according to Karoli from DrumsnWhistles.

The single eyewitness account coming from a Moveon.Org blogger. Of course. So beware protestors, if you act “aggressive” — whatever that means — when an Obama thug decides to go through you rather than around you, there is potential for the ‘side of rational logic’ to go Mike Tyson on your digits. We are unable to determine if under ObamaCare’s Complete Lives System this elderly man would qualify for finger-reattachment surgery.

View article…